Google Wave killer app for HTML 5?

Posted on by

I’ve just been watching the google wave presentation. Pretty amazing application, it’ll probably scare the hell out of a number of communication software providers. But what’s even more amazing is that it’s almost entirely build using HTML 5. Just one feature needs the Google Gears plugin: drag and drop of desktop resources to the web-page. Google is working on adding this to the HTML 5 standard.

Google Wave more or less proves that almost all applications can be written using open web technology: Html 5, Javascript and CSS. There is no need for proprietary, single vendor, solutions. I think this is very important, especially now that the number of different devices is exploding with the mobile web. iPhone is now the best mobile platform, but Android has a good opportunity because not everyone like all the restrictions created by Apple. Palm might also become a relevant mobile platform again, Nokia still has a large market share, and some people still use Windows Mobile. Are you going to write native applications for all of these devices, bet on the current number one (Apple), or on the number one of yesterdays technology?

I think the savest bet when it comes to application development is on open web technologies. There are a number of frameworks that enable Javascript to take advantage of the device api’s, html 5 has support for caching and a local datastore. Html is not just for web applications anymore, HTML enables you to create web, mobile and desktop applications all with the same vendor independent, open technologies.

I’m really hoping that Google Wave will be the killer application for HTML 5, that people will upgrade their browsers and that developers will be able to take advantage of all the improvements modern browsers have to offer: better CSS implementations, improved Javascript performance, caching, local database, animations, drag and drop, etc.

The Web has been such a huge success because it wasn’t a single vendor solution. It is build on open standards, open for everyone worldwide to use. Without these open standards the web wouldn’t be the success it is today. If we want the mobile web to be as successful or more, it also needs to be build on open standards and open technology. If this happens it will be a bigger success than the desktop web: a lot more devices, always available, not just when your sitting behind your desk.

  • Pingback: Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life - Developers on Google Wave

  • Pingback:   4 Free Audio Players to Add Audio to Your Site  by ClintLalonde.net

  • http://twitter.com/devongovett devongovett

    Google Wave killer app for HTML 5? :: Andrej Koelewijn: http://bit.ly/SNGyk
    This comment was originally posted on Twitter

  • kotoffle

    Don’t forget that to many organisations, data is extremely valuable/commercially sensitive. Many people forget that web apps are hosted somewhere, even if they run client side. Not everyone wants google to see their sensitive data.

    I think a better model for developers into the future is developing code bundled with a web server, that allow organisations to host web apps themselves and not rely on free products that make money analysing sensitive data.

  • kotoffle

    Don’t forget that to many organisations, data is extremely valuable/commercially sensitive. Many people forget that web apps are hosted somewhere, even if they run client side. Not everyone wants google to see their sensitive data.

    I think a better model for developers into the future is developing code bundled with a web server, that allow organisations to host web apps themselves and not rely on free products that make money analysing sensitive data.

  • http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/ andrej

    I agree that many organisations aren’t comfortable with data hosted elsewhere. But i still think that convenience/price/quality will cause a lot of companies to use externally hosted applications. Especially small and medium sized companies. Don’t forget that running a highly available application is difficult, and expensive.

    I’m also not sure that hosting applications on site is more secure than offsite. Most companies hire a lot of external people, consultants, temps, etc. So external people will be able to see your data, weather it’s hosted onsite or not. And own employees can also be a security problem.

  • http://www.andrejkoelewijn.com/ akoelewijn

    I agree that many organisations aren’t comfortable with data hosted elsewhere. But i still think that convenience/price/quality will cause a lot of companies to use externally hosted applications. Especially small and medium sized companies. Don’t forget that running a highly available application is difficult, and expensive.

    I’m also not sure that hosting applications on site is more secure than offsite. Most companies hire a lot of external people, consultants, temps, etc. So external people will be able to see your data, weather it’s hosted onsite or not. And own employees can also be a security problem.

  • Pingback: Firefox 3.5 released :: Andrej Koelewijn

  • Pingback: HTML 5 - The Revolution will not be Televised | The Worm Hole

  • Jesse

    google is making the open sourcing the code. google doesn’t want to be the only wave provider, but make the wave protocol available to anyone, so that any one person or organization can host a wave server. in other words, if a business wanted to use the application for intra-business communication/collaboration, they could host it themselves and not have to deal with google selling information. they’re trying to replace email protocol.

  • Jesse

    google is making the open sourcing the code. google doesn’t want to be the only wave provider, but make the wave protocol available to anyone, so that any one person or organization can host a wave server. in other words, if a business wanted to use the application for intra-business communication/collaboration, they could host it themselves and not have to deal with google selling information. they’re trying to replace email protocol.