Andrej Koelewijn

  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • Departments
    • agile
    • architecture
    • cloud
    • java
    • mobile
    • open standards
    • oracle
    • oss
    • other
    • soa
    • software development
    • tablet
    • Uncategorized
    • web
  • Subscribe via RSS

Open Source is not about free labor

October 23rd, 2008  |  Published in oss  |  3 Comments

Tons of people still think opensource software is created by hobbyists (hackers) working for free from home. In Economy to Give Open-Source a good Thumping Andrew Keen argues that the upcoming economic downturn will make programmers think twice about working for free and this might hurt open source.

In my opinion he really doesn’t understand how open source works. To understand Open Source you have to understand the impact of the internet, and you have to understand the origins of Web 2.0. Internet has made worldwide collaboration possible. We’ve seen the effect this has on information and knowledge as is explained in books like The Wisdom of the crowds and The long tail.

The internet enables everybody to collaborate. The internet also enables you to aggregate every little effort. The result may be a big valuable thing.

Another thing you have to understand is that companies do a lot of stuff that isn’t really core business, but still has to be done, otherwise the core business doesn’t get done. So they’re paying for work that doesn’t directly result in something that can be sold.

What the internet does, is that it enables all these companies to work together on things that aren’t core business. And by collaborating they lower their costs, but together they are creating something of value.

A company may for example sell devices. These devices need an operating system, and it’s valuable for the company to make small changes to the operating system, so that their devices are improved. But creating a complete operating system is more costly that modifying an existing operating system.

Or a company may be in the business of selling cpu’s and it wants their customers to take advantage of some new features in these cpu’s. Just by improving an existing operating system a little bit they may achieve this goal.

Or a company may be in the business of selling databases. And by improving an existing operating system they improve the performance of their database.

Why create your own webserver as part of your application server when you can take an existing one, and slightly improve it?

Collaboration on non core efforts allows companies to seriously cut costs. This is made possible by the internet. But this collaboration is only possible if the code is available. That’s why Open Source is saving companies money. Even if they pay for the development of it.

  • http://www.gutenberg.ph/ Jeroen Hellingman

    For project Gutenberg, a large team of volunteers happily collaborate to republish out-of-copyright works of literature. They do this mainly because it is fun, and partly because the results help everybody. A lot of the volunteers here are not richt, but as long as they have time at hand, and can pay their connectivity bills, they will be coming.

    For free software, it is pure market economics–traditional market economy holds that prices will drop down to a production cost plus a reasonable margin. For commodity software, this means that even a $100 million OS will cost a few dollars for each copy, as their are so many millions of user to share the cost. The model that makes that price level possible is free software.

    Consider you are a company that has a customer for a certain feature. There are two ways you could build that feature: one build it from free software, or build it from proprietary software. Once there is a critical mass of free software, it becomes so much cheaper to use that critical mass than the alternative, that the price of free software (returning your feature to the community) makes economical sense. You still can sell the development of that new feature to the customer who needs it–turning the software industry into the service oriented industry it is supposed to be….

    All this transcends the total mess the kleptocrats and their cronies have made of the financial system.

  • http://www.gutenberg.ph Jeroen Hellingman

    For project Gutenberg, a large team of volunteers happily collaborate to republish out-of-copyright works of literature. They do this mainly because it is fun, and partly because the results help everybody. A lot of the volunteers here are not richt, but as long as they have time at hand, and can pay their connectivity bills, they will be coming.

    For free software, it is pure market economics–traditional market economy holds that prices will drop down to a production cost plus a reasonable margin. For commodity software, this means that even a $100 million OS will cost a few dollars for each copy, as their are so many millions of user to share the cost. The model that makes that price level possible is free software.

    Consider you are a company that has a customer for a certain feature. There are two ways you could build that feature: one build it from free software, or build it from proprietary software. Once there is a critical mass of free software, it becomes so much cheaper to use that critical mass than the alternative, that the price of free software (returning your feature to the community) makes economical sense. You still can sell the development of that new feature to the customer who needs it–turning the software industry into the service oriented industry it is supposed to be….

    All this transcends the total mess the kleptocrats and their cronies have made of the financial system.

  • Pingback: acato.nu » Open-source-crisis? » do what you like, like what you do

Tags

activemq agile bi camel css esb google governance grails groovy gtalk html5 internet ipad ivy J2EE java javascript jaxrs jmx jquery lean linkeddata linux maven mule noiv openoffice opensource Open Source oracle osgi oss rdbms rest scrum servicemix soa sql svg tablet web 2.0 XML xmpp yql

Archives

  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • June 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org

Recent Posts

  • Updating a vagrant box
  • Using littleproxy in Mule unit tests
  • Useful site to determine what html5, css3 & svg you can use
  • A Product Owner is a Project Manager
  • Using css webfonts in inkscape

Categories

  • agile
  • architecture
  • cloud
  • java
  • mobile
  • open standards
  • oracle
  • oss
  • other
  • soa
  • software development
  • tablet
  • Uncategorized
  • web

Recent Comments

  • Pcdiggs on Software architecture, PHP and Javascript
  • Een Scrum Product Owner is een Project Leider on A Product Owner is a Project Manager
  • Using css webfonts in inkscape :: Andrej Koelewijn on Create presentations using inkscape
  • Create presentations using inkscape :: Andrej Koelewijn on Presentation: Introduction to Scrum
  • Gebhard Greiter on What is Agile?
Buzz
andrkoel: Utrecht hele dag mist, scheveningen zomerse dag... http://t.co/cDRCJHr9
4:35 PM Nov 10, 2011, comment
andrkoel: RT @stefanvdkamp: Beter filmpje van Garret McNamara in de 30 meter hoge golf. http://t.co/9abiWkYX
9:20 AM Nov 10, 2011, comment
andrkoel: Mmm, een uur voor den haag - leiden lijkt te weinig, ga mijn afspraak niet redden...
7:34 AM Nov 10, 2011, comment
andrkoel: Big Data is Useless without Science http://t.co/2I8EiLsH
6:18 AM Nov 10, 2011, comment
andrkoel: Just tried #vagrant to quickly setup virtualbox development environment. Looks good, although provisioning apache through puppet failed...
10:47 PM Nov 09, 2011, comment
 


©2012 Andrej Koelewijn
Powered by WordPress using the Gridline Lite theme by Graph Paper Press.